First report of Gymnosporangium clavipes Cooke & Peck affecting Crataegus mexicana var. Chapeado and C. gracilior in Mexico

Article information

Res. Plant Dis. 2015;21(3):250-253
Publication date (electronic) : 2015 September 30
doi : https://doi.org/10.5423/RPD.2015.21.3.250
1 Fitopatología, Instituto de Fitosanidad, Campus Montecillo, Colegio de Postgraduados. Km 36.5 Carretera México-Texcoco. Montecillo, Texcoco, 56230. Estado de México, México
2 Departamento de Fitotecnia y Parasitología Agrícola, Universidad Autónoma Chapingo. Km 38.5 Carretera México-Texcoco. Chapingo, Texcoco, 56230. Estado de México, México
3 CINVESTAV-IPN Unidad Querétaro. Libramiento Norponiente # 2000 Fraccionamiento Real de Juriquilla Santiago de Querétaro, 76230, Querétaro, México
4 Departamento de Biotecnología, CIIDIR, IPN Unidad Michoacán, Justo Sierra # 28 Jiquilpan, 59510, Michoacán, México
*Corresponding author Tel : +52- 595-109-42-90 E-mail: edgar.nieto@colpos.mx
Received 2014 July 08; Revised 2015 August 25; Accepted 2015 August 31.

Abstract

The tejocote (Crataegus spp.) is a tree considered to be native to Mexico. The aim of this study was to identify the causal agent of tejocote rust in the State of Puebla. Tejocote fruits were sampled in 2012 and 2013. The fungus was studied morphologically using light and scanning electron microscopy and molecularly using phylogenetic analysis of 18S and 28S rDNA genes. The fungus was identified as Gymnosporangium clavipes on tejocote fruits. To our knowledge, this is the first confirmed report of Gymnosporangium clavipes Cooke & Peck affecting Crataegus mexicana var. Chapeado and C. gracilior in Puebla Mexico.

body

Species of the genus, Crataegus, are commonly called ‘’tejocote’’ in Mexico. This country is the largest producer of tejocote with 3,675 t in 2014 (SIAP 2015). Gymnosporangium species are heteroecious, producing the aecial phase on leaves and fruit of pome hosts and the telial phase on leaves, stems and branches of cypress (Cupressus spp.) and juniper (Juniperus spp.) (Sinclair and Lyon, 2005). In Mexico, there have been several species of Gymnosporangium reported, including G. clavipes in Crataegus mexicana and Crataegus sp. (León-Gallegos and Cummins, 1981). During May to September in 2012 and 2013, aecia fruits (Fig. 1A) were collected from Crataegus mexicana Moc. & Sessé var. Chapeado (SNICS TEJ-002-160709) and C. gracilior Phipps plantations in the Trans-Mexican Neovolcanic Belt in the State of Puebla. These samples were deposited as ENCB 121364 Crataegus mexicana var. Chapeado and C. gracilior as ENCB 121365 at the fungus collection of Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas at the Instituto Politécnico Nacional. Peridium and aeciospores measurements were taken using the software Images Plus 2.0 (Motic, Hong Kong, CH). The width and length of the aecia were measured using the Image Tool v 3.0 software (UTHSCSA, USA). Key (Kern, 1973) and the diagnostic protocol (EPPO, 2006) were used. These specimens were observed using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) XL 30 ESEM (Philips, A’dam, NED) with a range of 2.5-20 Kv. The ornamentation of the outer, side and inner walls of the peridial cells of aecia and the ornamentation of the aeciospores were observed based on the classification (Lee and Kakishima, 1999ab). Aecia were roestelioid and white in colour, measuring 7.59-15.25 × 0.54-0.79 μm, with little dehiscent peridium (Fig. 1B). On the peridial cell walls of aecia, outer (Fig. 1C) and side walls were smooth (Fig. 1D). However, the inner walls were tuberculate (Fig. 1D). Aeciospores were ellipsoid and orange in colour, measuring 18.8-37.6 × 24.0-57.2 μm (Fig. 1E). The ornamentation of aeciospores presented small annulations (Fig. 1F). Based on morphological characteristics, the fungus was identified as Gymnosporangium clavipes (EPPO, 2006; Kern, 1973). For confirmation of morpho)logy-based identification, the specimens (ENCB 121364 and 121365) were subjected to molecular analysis. Aecia samples amplified with the primers D1/D2 and Rust18S-R/NS1, resulted in the expected band of 700 bp and 1750 bp, respectively. The PCR products were purified and sequenced. The resulting sequence generating primer pair, D1/D2, was deposited to the GeneBank database as tejocote fruit aecia ENCB 121364 (GenBank accession No. KM382067) and analysed for similarity to known sequences in the database. The sequence showed high similarity to G. clavipes up to 99% (GenBank accession Nos. DQ354545 and HQ317528). In addition, the resulting sequence generating primer pair, Rust18S-R/NS1, the resulting sequence was deposited to the GeneBank database as tejocote fruit aecia ENCB 121365 (GenBank accession No. KM382070). The sequence also showed high similarity to G. clavipes up to 99% (GenBank accession No. DQ354546). In most reports of the species discussing about Gymnosporangium rust, the pathogenicity test was not carried out (Dervis et al., 2010; Lee and Kakishima, 1999a, b; Yun et al., 2008; Yun et al., 2009). Although G. clavipes had been identified previously (León-Gallegos and Cummins, 1981) in C. mexicana and Crataegus sp., in this study, we have additionally employed SEM to identify infection on the specific tejocote species and varieties and molecular analysis. To our knowledge, this is the first confirmed report of Gymnosporangium clavipes affecting Crataegus mexicana var. Chapeado and C. gracilior in Puebla, Mexico.

Fig. 1

Aecial phase of Gymnosporangium clavipes. (A) Aecia fruits. (B) Apex dehiscent aecia (Scale bar=1 mm). (C) The outer walls (OW) of peridial cells are smooth (Scale bar=10 μm). (D) The side walls (SW) of peridial cells are smooth and the inner walls (IW) of peridial cells are tuberculate (Scale bar=10 μm). (E) Orange aeciospores have thick walls (Scale bar=20 μm). (F) Ornamentation of aeciospores has small annulations (Scale bar= 10 μm).

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Dr. Enrique Guizar Nolazco (Forestry and Ecology Division of Forestry Sciences, Universidad Autónoma Chapingo) for assisting in the identification of hosts and to Dr. Juan Manuel Tovar-Pedraza (Colegio de Postgraduados) for advising on the manuscript. This work was supported by Colegio de Postgraduados and SINAREFI-SNICS-SAGARPA (Secretaria de Agricultura, Ganadería, Desarrollo Rural, Pesca y Alimentación).

References

Dervis S, Dixon L, Doganlar M, Rossman A. Gall production on hawthorns caused by Gymnosporangium spp. in Hatay province, Turkey. Phytoparasitica 2010;38:391–400. 10.1007/s12600-010-0102-z.
European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization(EPPO). Gymnosporangium spp. (non european). 2006;
Kern F. D. A revised taxonomic account of Gymnosporangium 1973. P. A., USA: Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park.
Lee S. K, Kakishima M. Aeciospore surface structures of Gymnosporangium and Roestelia (Uredinales). Mycoscience 1999a;40:109–120. 10.1007/BF02464289.
Lee S. K, Kakishima M. Surface structures of peridial cells of Gymnosporangium and Roestelia (Uredinales). Mycoscience 1999b;40:121–131. 10.1007/BF02464290.
León-Gallegos H. M, Cummins G. B. Uredinales (Royas) de México 1981. I and IICuliacán, Sinaloa, México: Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Agrícolas, Secretaria de Agricultura y Recursos Hidráulicos.
SIAP. Anuario Estadístico de la Producción Agrícola. 2015. INEGI, SAGARPA, México.
SNICS. Catálogo nacional de variedades vegetales 2012. México: SAGARPA.
Sinclair W. A, Lyon H. H. Diseases of trees and shrubs 2005. 2nd edth ed. Ithaca, N. Y., USA: Cornell Univ Press.
Yun H. Y, Lee K. J, Kim Y. H, Lee S. K. First report of Gymnosporangium globosum causing American hawthorn rust in Korea. Plant Pathol. J 2008;24:84–86. 10.5423/PPJ.2008.24.1.084.
Yun H. Y, Hong S. G, Rossman A. Y, Lee S. K, Lee K. J, Bae K. S. The rust fungus Gymnosporangium in Korea including two new species. Mycologia 2009;101:790–809. 10.3852/08-221. 19927745.
White T. J, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J. In : Innis M. A., Gelfand D. H., Sninsky J. J., White T.J., eds. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications 1990. San Diego, USA: Academic Press. p. 315–322.

Article information Continued

Fig. 1

Aecial phase of Gymnosporangium clavipes. (A) Aecia fruits. (B) Apex dehiscent aecia (Scale bar=1 mm). (C) The outer walls (OW) of peridial cells are smooth (Scale bar=10 μm). (D) The side walls (SW) of peridial cells are smooth and the inner walls (IW) of peridial cells are tuberculate (Scale bar=10 μm). (E) Orange aeciospores have thick walls (Scale bar=20 μm). (F) Ornamentation of aeciospores has small annulations (Scale bar= 10 μm).